Federal Election Position

SEN supports the transition to Renewable Energy.  Therefore, SEN supports candidates who:-

• Accept that global warming and climate change is occurring;
• Have plans to do something about it in terms of assisting a transition to renewable energy as a policy position; and
• Are against the development of fracking because it contributes to global warming and pollutes the environment and is unnecessary.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Climate Council Fact Sheet: Climate Policies of Major Australian Political Parties

"The Climate Council’s factsheet, Climate Policies of Major Australian Political Parties, summarises climate policies of the three major parties, using information sourced from their respective centrepiece policy documents. It is not a comparative analysis by the Climate Council. Many of these policies are proposals and have yet to be implemented or detailed fully."

Conservation Council Election Scorecard

The Conservation Council of WA has also produced a Climate Voter Scorecard. [May 10 2019]

Joint SEN Presents - 29 April 2019

SEN and the Power & Energy Society hosted a joint event about “Operating the Grid with Low Inertia”, where Julius Susanto presented on on the new AEMO modelling tools.

Here is the recording of the presentation. [10 May 2019]

Sustainability Workshop

SEN Federal Election Scorecard

Who supports Clean Energy in the 2019 Federal Election? Here is our analysis of the policy positions of all parties. [8 May 2019]

Special SEN Presents with Jay Weatherill

Jay Weatherill, ex premier of South Australia joined Sustainable Energy Now, BDO and Citizens Climate Lobby (CCL) for a discussion around energy transition, the role of government, challenges WA faces and the deal with Tesla. 

SEN disappointed at New Bus Purchase announcement

Sustainable Energy Now is deeply disappointed with the decision of the Western Australian Government to enter into a contract to purchase 900 new diesel buses over ten years, when electric buses would be a better option for a government with aspirations to be progressive and innovative. See our statement here. [21 March 2019]

SEN welcomes Electricity Planning announcement

SEN welcomes the Labor Government's announcement of a long overdue electricity planning process in Western Australia. Our views on the Whole of System Plan and Distributed Energy Resources Roadmap are available through this media release, and this more detailed statement. [11 March 2019]

SEN's recent contributions to the WA Energy Debate

Many of SEN's policy team made major contributions to our 52pp submission to the WA Scientific Inquiry into Fracking. Thanks also to researchers who provided advice and material to the SEN Policy team in preparing the submission. 

SEN also presented insights on the energy transition to the Public Utilities Office (PUO). The PUO advise government on, amongst other things, matters relating to energy security, cost, policy options and futures. 

LINKS: 

• Our presentation to the PUO, PDF [1.6 MB]
• SEN submission to Western Australian Scientific Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia PDF [2.0 MB]
• Appendix Document: Western Australian Tight Gas Industry: A review of groundwater and environmental risks. PDF [4.7 MB]
• WA Fracking Inquiry submissions library.

To view a list of our recent statements click here

For a round up of renewable energy technologies and SEN, download our Flyer. 

SEN promotes practical, affordable strategies for a sustainable global future by the adoption of renewable energy. SEN is a dynamic and independent WA association.

What happens when the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow?

As is the case now, a mix of different forms of generation on the WA grid will ensure supply regardless of weather conditions. During still nights or during periods of heavy cloud cover, biomass and energy storage will be used. Locating wind plant in many different areas will help ensure that windless periods are short and infrequent. Solar PV, being mainly dispersed on rooftops and varied in it's orientation, evens out the impact of localised cloud cover.  Additionally, energy storage is inherent with Concentrated solar thermal (CST) generation and biomass thermal backup can also be incorporated.

During times when wind and solar generation exceed the load on the grid, storage facilities will be charged with any remaining excess generation curtailed.

What about the peak load?

Solar alone will go along way to supplying the peak load. Energy storage and biomass will be able provide the remaining power requirements.  Peak 'lopping' (by delaying or precooling buildings and cold storage), and shifting of non-critical electricity use to other times, will reduce these peak loads.  Other demand management and energy efficiency options will help even further.

What about Baseload?

Baseload is the load on a system that is on all the time, every hour of the year, the minimum generation required on the network. The load on the South West network varies with the time of day, day of the week, season of the year and the weather. This is demonstrated below by comparing the week with the biggest load (3,744MW, week beginning 20th of January) in 2014 with the week of the smallest load (1,438MW, week starting 7th of April).

    Image is from the IMO website, http://www.imowa.com.au/#weekly-numbers-generation.

Baseload generators are designed to be run 24hrs/day every day of the week at a constant output. They are shut down when they need maintenance.

Baseload generation in WA is supplied by large centralised coal fired power stations that cannot be ramped up and down easily due to their size (thick chunks of steel and concrete can suffer cracking from thermal expansion and contraction if changes are too quick). They are also relatively expensive to build but ‘cheap’ to run and so have typically operated most of the time to make them more economic.

Currently, to ensure that the load is always met, on top of baseload generation, mid merit combined cycle gas turbines are used. They can be ramped up or down more easily to follow the load. This type of plant is cheaper to install but more expensive to run.

For the rare spikes in load that come from air conditioning after a run of hot working week days, peaking plant are used. They are usually cheapest to install but most expensive to run.

Baseload generators are not essential for the network if sufficient alternative generation is available.

Integrating continuously variable wind and solar

Into this mix, ever increasing levels of wind and solar can be added. While both produce according to the wind and sunshine available at the time, the larger renewable energy projects can be curtailed if required. They can do this balancing cheaper and quicker than fossil fuelled generators and, on the rare occasions when high winds cross the entire wind fleet late at night, this already occurs.

Increasing penetration of constantly varying wind and solar generation mean more ramping up and down of gas plant but reduce the actual gas consumed.

As solar only occurs during the day, it has little direct impact on baseload but will reduce the amount of gas consumed in the mid merit generators. Solar generators have the effect of reducing the peak load and pushing it further into the evening.

What about carbon capture and storage (CCS) or 'clean coal'?

Wind turbines, photovoltaics (rooftop solar and solar farms), solar thermal and biomass are proven and widely implemented technologies, while even proponents of carbon geo-sequestration admit it is 10 to 15 years away. The extra energy required for CCS and the limited availability of suitable sites are also obstacles.

Aren't renewable energy technologies expensive?

Depends very much on the resources available but here in WA, rooftop solar is already at 'grid parity' (competing with retail prices). Photovoltiacs have dropped 75% in cost over the past four years and are set to continue, albeit at a more gradual pace. The cost of wind generation continues to drop gradually. Costs of CST (with energy storage) are also competing with new fossil-powered stations. 

Unlike sustainable energy, the burning of fossil fuels has additional costs from pollution, including carbon emissions, particulates, NOx, SOx, mercury and radioactive particles. While these costs are real and affect the health of locals and the environment, they are neglected in the economics of fossil fuelled electricity.  This is a serious deficiency in current energy economics.

Note that the cost of generation is half the electricity bill. The cost of transmission, distribution, balancing, spinning reserve, backup and administration cover the other half.

Does switching to renewables mean fewer jobs?

Renewable energy generally employs more people than coal or gas per MWh generated. As of end of 2013, 21,000 people were directly employed in the renewable energy industry in Australia.